Data sovereignty vs Azure hosting options -
i'm learning azure forgive me naivety. work federal government hesitant have applications , data hosted in country. local company offer "azure" services? i.e. software developers in government department build applications , deploy them azure cloud, ensuring data stays within country? or have @ non-microsoft cloud provider?
data , compute reside in datacenter specify. blobs, tables , queues backed automatically paired data center:
- san antonio <--> chicago
- dublin <--> amsterdam
- hong kong <--> singapore
you can opt-out of cross-datacenter data backup if data sovereignty becomes issue. once opted-out, data in specified data center, , you'd need handle dr on own (by possibly backing data on-premises storage).
aside 6 datacenters, fujitsu runs windows azure data center in japan. see this press release more info.
Comments
Post a Comment